What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study

What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 55
Release :
ISBN-13 : OCLC:1304457725
ISBN-10 :
Rating : 4/5 ( Downloads)

Book Synopsis What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study by : Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg

Download or read book What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study written by Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg and published by . This book was released on 2018 with total page 55 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This paper employs meta-analysis to aggregate and systematically analyze the mixed empirical evidence on the determinants of corporate hedging reported in 132 previously published studies covering data from more than 73,000 firms. Among the fourteen proxy variables analyzed by multivariate meta-analysis, three variables emerge as reliable explanatory factors for corporate hedging decisions supporting the bankruptcy and financial distress hypothesis: dividend yield (positive sign), liquidity (negative sign), and size (positive sign). Moreover, for tax-loss carry forwards (positive sign) and research and development (positive sign), our findings indicate a weak impact on corporate hedging behavior reflecting tax reasons, the coordination between financing and investment, and agency conflicts between shareholders and debtholders. Regarding the asymmetric information and agency conflicts of equity hypothesis, we find no explanatory power. The further analysis of heterogeneity via meta-regression reveals several factors that determine the mixed empirical evidence reported in previous studies. First, the results indicate that studies analyzing firms from North America report, on average, a lower impact of leverage on the corporate hedging decision. Moreover, studies examining more recent data samples tend to find a weaker relation between tangible assets and hedging, R&D and hedging respectively. Overall, our results encourage scientific research to put more emphasis on finer-grained examinations of hedging variations and to discover rationales of corporate hedging extending classical financial theories.


What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study Related Books

What Do We Really Know About Corporate Hedging? A Meta-Analytical Study
Language: en
Pages: 55
Authors: Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This paper employs meta-analysis to aggregate and systematically analyze the mixed empirical evidence on the determinants of corporate hedging reported in 132 p
Does Corporate Hedging Enhance Shareholder Value? A Meta-Analysis
Language: en
Pages: 35
Authors: Wolfgang Bessler
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The theories underpinning corporate use of derivatives are well developed. Furthermore, there exist compelling economic reasons why hedging should lead to enhan
Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Language: en
Pages: 350
Authors: Michael Borenstein
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011-08-24 - Publisher: John Wiley & Sons

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book provides a clear and thorough introduction to meta-analysis, the process of synthesizing data from a series of separate studies. Meta-analysis has bec
The Future of Meta-Analysis
Language: en
Pages: 239
Authors: Kenneth W. Wachter
Categories: Psychology
Type: BOOK - Published: 1990-06-28 - Publisher: Russell Sage Foundation

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Scientific progress often begins with the difficult task of preparing informed, conclusive reviews of existing research. Since the 1970s, the traditional "subje
What Drives Financial Hedging? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Corporate Hedging Determinants
Language: en
Pages: 46
Authors: Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

We examine the drivers of heterogeneity among the determinants of corporate hedging by applying meta-regression analysis on a sample of 175 primary studies. Tak